Choosing Ski Length - Part 1: Historical Perspective

One of the most discussed topics in our mogul and powder clinics is the question … “What length ski should I be on?”. In the first of this four part discussion we will take the first step toward answering this question, beginning with some historical context.

The sport of skiing has its roots in racing and, over time, most of the “heros” of the ski world have been FIS World Cup or Olympic racers (e.g. Stein Erickson, Phil Mahr, Hermann Maier, Sarah Schleper, Bode Miller, Janica Kostelic, etc.). These racing “heros” have defined the standard of excellence for being “the best in the sport of skiing”. And skiing and speed are often used in the same sentence.

Why did we bring this up? It is because we believe that conventional thinking regarding ski length is biased around the notion that skiing is about going fast and that most recreational skiers either want to, or should, ski fast. After all, mounds of testosterone and screaming down the slope at Mach 5 is supposed to be what skiing is all about! Isn’t it?

The unintended consequence of assuming that most people want to ski fast is a bias toward recommending and selling longer ski lengths. Why? Because longer skis generally have a larger turning radius. Therefore, they spend more time in the fall line … which means they can, and do, ski faster than a shorter ski. Short skis go slower, and who wants to do that?

Our experience, however, tells us that in in a number of instances cases a shorter ski can have a significant advantage over a longer ski. For example, if the skier is older, doesn’t want to ski fast, prefers mogul and powder terrain versus groomed runs, is fearful or has anxiety, is out-of-shape or has slowing reflexes, has a medical condition or has had an orthopedic injury or only skis a small number of days each season. All of these factors, and more just might make a shorter ski a better choice for achieving your skiing objectives. If your skiing objective is to be the fastest one down a race course then you may want to be on a beefy long ski. However, if you are more conservative and have little interest in being the fastest one on the mountain then you might discover that a longer is actually making it harder for you to achieve your objectives.

The way you should pick your ski model and ski length should be based upon your own personal skiing objectives, not because it’s the ski that Hermann Maier uses or because you saw the ski marketed as a “hot” ski, or the latest thing, in SKI Magazine.

In the next part of our discussion - Choosing Ski Length: Five Decision Factors - we suggest the five major factors you should consider in selecting the appropriate ski length for you.

Choosing Ski Length - Part 2: Five Decision Factors
Choosing Ski Length - Part 3: Making The Decision
Choosing Ski Length - Part 4: Final Thoughts

For more tips to improve your skiing, sign up for the Bumps For Boomers FREE Weekly Mogul And Powder Skiing Tips Newsletter.

Popularity: 14% [?]

5 Responses to “Choosing Ski Length - Part 1: Historical Perspective”

  1. BUMPS FOR BOOMERS Weblog » Blog Archive » Choosing Ski Length - Part 4: Final Thoughts Says:

    […] Choosing Ski Length - Part 1: Historical Perspective Choosing Ski Length - Part 2: Five Decision Factors Choosing Ski Length - Part 3: Making The Decision […]

  2. BUMPS FOR BOOMERS Weblog » Blog Archive » Choosing Ski Length - Part 3: Making The Decision Says:

    […] Choosing Ski Length - Part 1: Historical Perspective Choosing Ski Length - Part 2: Five Decision Factors Choosing Ski Length - Part 4: Final Thoughts […]

  3. BUMPS FOR BOOMERS Weblog » Blog Archive » Choosing Ski Length - Part 2: Five Decision Factors Says:

    […] « Choosing Ski Length - Part 3: Making The Decision Choosing Ski Length - Part 1: Historical Perspective » […]

  4. ludwig putz Says:

    Mr. Nevin
    I am 77 years old, but still somewhat energized skier, skiing on 174cm Solomon XSCREAM. Thinking about something a little wider and shorter. Should I?
    Was looking at K2nApache Rinkon or Outlaws. or the new Solomon X Wing
    Would any one of those or any other be a good Choice?
    Would appreciate your comment. Thinking about seeing you next season in your Bumps for (Over)boomers. Too old for that?
    Thanks so much.
    Ludwig

  5. boomer Says:

    Ludwig … the “best” length of a ski for you is a function of many things (see our four part article on Choosing Ski Length). What I can tell you is that we have substantial experience teaching mogul and powder skiing to “older” (>age 50) skiers. On the 3rd clinic day we suggest that these “older” clients move to a shorter mid-fat all-mountain ski in the 150cm - 160cm range. To a person they are amazed at how well they can ski these “shorter” length skis in off-piste conditions. The K2 Apache Recon ski you mentioned is a good choice (I believe the shortest it comes is in a 160cm length). The Solomon X Wing is also a good choice and serveral clients have used it in a 154cm length with great results (including one person in our last clinic who rented it and then negotiated a purchase of the rental skis at the end of the day) . I can also recommend the Atomic Metron 10 in a 15ocm or 157cm length (Stapleton Ski Shop in Aspen just put their end-of-season Atomic inventory on a 50% off sale). By the way - 77 is not too old. We just had fun skiing with an age 76 client (who is turning 77 on April 30) who had a wonderful time in the 3 day clinic. If you want to talk to him, let me know.

Leave a Reply